Under conditions, Nepal will have to restore a lot of credibility to the MCC. In a certain sense, the rewriting of laws. In history, we have seen mcc had agreements with Srilanka in our closest neighborhood, but MCC agreements have also been concluded with many countries in Africa and the Middle East. In practice, it is not only natural for Nepal to find a middle ground to resolve the MCC dilemma. The Nepalese and U.S. governments should explore spaces where they can both see a win-win situation. It is hoped that, as a staunch defender of democracy, the US government may consider introducing into the agreement, in response to public outcry, some additional changes or clarifications to facilitate the impasse in the implementation of the project. It may consider making some changes and clarifications amicably; and if they cannot be included in the Treaty, they may be annexed to it as a Memorandum of Understanding. However, another part of the ruling party, led by Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, has defended the pact and wants the current session of the House to ratify it. Nepal`s opposition Congress also argued that the agreement should be approved without delay. The arguments in favour of the Treaty are no less competitive. First, it is a project with a well-structured and implementation-oriented five-year work plan that addresses Nepal`s real infrastructure construction needs to facilitate the transmission of electricity and thus promote the import and export of hydropower.
It was signed in 2017, before the United States articulated its Indo-Pacific strategy, which is in itself a multi-column strategy that has more than one military component. Secondly, the general status of the draft is misinterpreted with regard to the laws of Nepal. Most aid project agreements may have a provision to ensure that project implementation is not affected by changes in the legislation and guidelines of donor and recipient countries. Thirdly, the need for parliamentary ratification prior to the implementation of the project is to ensure the support of all parties for the proper implementation of the projects and the assistance of the State in negotiations with the Government of India on the issues of export and import of electricity via the planned transmission lines. I think the MCC agreement with Nepal is a total trap for Nepal. It may seem like a very good opportunity for today, but it will later lead to more difficult situations, We will lose our rights in our own country. It`s the worst scene I can imagine. The meeting could not reach an agreement and the decision on this matter was handed over to the party secretariat. Some have said that the saber rumble in the central committee was just a populist act to appear nationalist. The MCC pact does not say it needs to be ratified by the Nepalese parliament.
However, the text of the agreement states that in the event of a conflict, the provisions of the covenant take precedence over Nepal`s existing laws, which requires parliamentary ratification under the Nepal Treaty Act. .